You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For the moment, the map's position in the search page is defined by searchMapCenter and searchMapZoom, which is accurate for all content, but may be less so for content filtered by, for example, “districts” or “cities”.
I think it would be interesting to adjust all filtered content when the user comes from a page other than /search.
I wonder if it's still relevant when the user is already in the search page : the flashing map could be annoying. Maybe adding a button to "fit with the content" could be an alternative?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
While testing searching for treks to see the filter according to the map I found some inaccurate results from the user's point of view.
See the video below. Capture vidéo du 2025-01-13 12-09-02.webm
As we can see "23 - Le Chemin du Roy" is listed as filtered trek but we can't see it on the map.
For the moment, the map's position in the search page is defined by
searchMapCenter
andsearchMapZoom
, which is accurate for all content, but may be less so for content filtered by, for example, “districts” or “cities”.I think it would be interesting to adjust all filtered content when the user comes from a page other than
/search
.I wonder if it's still relevant when the user is already in the search page : the flashing map could be annoying. Maybe adding a button to "fit with the content" could be an alternative?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: