Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for virtual tags #121

Open
bergercookie opened this issue Jan 19, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Support for virtual tags #121

bergercookie opened this issue Jan 19, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@bergercookie
Copy link
Contributor

bergercookie commented Jan 19, 2023

Hello, 👋

Thanks for your work maintaining taskwarrior as well as this library :)

AFAICT, tasklib doesn't support virtual tags, e.g., +TODAY

From the command line, I get the following information:

Name          Value
ID            735
Description   kalispera
...
Tags          test_gcal
Virtual tags  DUE DUETODAY LATEST MONTH OVERDUE PENDING QUARTER READY TAGGED TODAY UDA UNBLOCKED WEEK YEAR
UUID          ba8133fd-9b69-4c97-8141-60aeff276780

But exporting the data of the same task in tasklib shows the following:

'{"id":735,"description":"kalispera","due":"20230118T220000Z","entry":"20230119T144350Z","modified":"20230119T145926Z","status":"pending","twgcalsyncduration":"PT15M","uuid":"ba8133fd-9b69-4c97-8141-60aeff276780","tags":"test_gcal","urgency":9.92383}'

I'm the maintainer of syncall and while I'm currently using taskw for communicating with taskwarrior, I consider switching to tasklib.

This would be really useful feature to have :)

Related ticket: bergercookie/syncall#59

@KarstenSchulz
Copy link

Hi!

I am also interested in having this feature. If a corresponding implementation would have a chance of being adopted, I would use the information from https://taskwarrior.org/docs/tags/#supported-virtual-tags and make one. What do the maintainers think?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants