Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

hadron missing headers in configure.ac #304

Open
kostrzewa opened this issue Sep 1, 2020 · 6 comments
Open

hadron missing headers in configure.ac #304

kostrzewa opened this issue Sep 1, 2020 · 6 comments

Comments

@kostrzewa
Copy link
Member

kostrzewa commented Sep 1, 2020

probably, we should fix this...

[email addresses and recipients redacted]

A recent update to the toolchain on macOS is causing configure failures if
exit() is used undeclared in conftest.c fragments (#include <stdlib.h> is
needed).

This appears to affect packages

DRIP diversitree hadron island lwgeom rgdal rgeos ridge uFTIR vapour

NB: for some of these some but not all configure tests include stdlib.h, so
this list comes from examining the code, not just empirical testing. I failed
to install some of the spatial packages on macOS using SU's binaries, but

DRIP diversitree hadron island

all failed to install and ridge failed to find GSL.

It seems likely that this toolchain update was premature (by Apple -- has
happened before), as it installed a beta toolchain. But it would be good to
have this corrected sooner rather than later as it is likely this will become
the toolchain for macOS 11.0 within a few weeks.

@urbach
Copy link
Member

urbach commented Sep 2, 2020

see branch CRAN-3.1.0-bugfix.

I don't know yet how to upload a bugfix to CRAN. We should probably also keep this branch for further bugfixes.

@urbach
Copy link
Member

urbach commented Sep 3, 2020

or shall we just take the latest version?

@martin-ueding
Copy link
Contributor

I would just publish whatever latest version that we have. I mean we don't have to support some particular feature versions.

@martin-ueding
Copy link
Contributor

Also that fix in the configure.ac is trivial, and should not break anything. I think that we can just merge that into the master and then try to update a new version for CRAN.

@urbach
Copy link
Member

urbach commented Sep 3, 2020 via email

@martin-ueding
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, I use the R6 in the new_matrixfit models.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants