Remove Lit feature flag

[plor]

#1774 was developed for Lit integration, but they didn't have some API to support it. We merged the code but put it in a feature flag that can be removed once everything is good and working.

relavent pr and comment - #1897 (comment)

[brossetti1]

spoke with Chris at Lit

follow up tasks for our side:

• add chain to url variables - for v3 modal.
• generate auth sig on our side and pass as url param
• pass null in signature on daohaus side, along with switchChains: false.
• redirect to lit protocol will add the signature into the url button will do this while also the signature we collect on our side.

[plor]

Should I separate these into separate issues so we can work piecemeal on it, or are these all just necessary for removing the flag?

[brossetti1]

these are all required for removing the flag - lets leave them here. Chris from Lit has to make changes on his end, which prompted these changes here -- there are some small issues with the signature collection on their end, but we worked out a way to make the flow much easier for our users and their users.

We just have to wait on his updates now, i addressed a most of these after our call already

[plor]

I moved to "ready for dev" so you can start working on the follow up tasks at your leisure, no rush though.

[plor]

Lit responded Friday, going to finish this up.

[brossetti1]

looked at finishing this up after recieving some communication back from chris at lit, seems like there are still some issues to be worked out here on lits side - sent a message back to chris on the matter

[plor]

can the follow-up tasks be tackled or are we fully blocked?

[brossetti1]

blocked until chris gets back, some things we discussed the other week still have not been addressed, they ar emaking progress, but its still a blocker for us

[plor]

@brossetti1 any more word from Lit? I'd be happy to try to close this out so you can focus on V3 if that is possible.