Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Multi-dimensional fitness evaluation #20

Open
anandtrex opened this issue Mar 29, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

Multi-dimensional fitness evaluation #20

anandtrex opened this issue Mar 29, 2017 · 1 comment
Labels
low-priority

Comments

@anandtrex
Copy link
Contributor

Should it be a weighted sum (as it is currently) or a lexicographic ordering?
@maharjun
Copy link
Contributor

maharjun commented Apr 4, 2017

The major issue with lexicographical ordering is of floating point inequalities. The probability that the first elements of two fitness tuples are exactly equal is negligibly small. Thus what's gonna end up happening is that the further dimensions are never really going to come into consideration.

alperyeg pushed a commit to alperyeg/L2L that referenced this issue Oct 8, 2020
@sdiazpier
Merge pull request IGITUGraz#20 from Meta-optimization/testsuit
1cca55d 
Testsuit includes now setup and all optimizers with the new experiment class.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
low-priority
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@anandtrex @maharjun