-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Design and sample: groups and logic flow #52
Comments
Moved to other issues: "For Q4 and Q7 data check should exclude numeric entry for 0 groups and 0 conditions" ------> issue to add simple numerical limits (#33) |
Resolved: "Since this is not intuitive for all users we should add an info pop up for "If all participants not divided into separate groups, please enter 1 to indicate 1 condition " and "If your within subjects data is not divided into separate conditions, please enter 1 to indicate 1 condition"" |
Resolved: Q5 and Q8 (name of groups/conditions) can be hidden unless a value larger than 1 is input. |
Resolved by putting them in the same sub-section called "Groups and within-subject conditions", this was indeed odd: |
Remaining: "•Q4 and Q7 mismatch in the structure of follow-on questions: This one is not clear: What would be the comparable question to "How many participants did each group have after exclusion?" for within-subject conditions? |
•For Q4 and Q7 data check should exclude numeric entry for 0 groups and 0 conditions
Since this is not intuitive for all users we should add an info pop up for "If all participants not divided into separate groups, please enter 1 to indicate 1 condition " and "If your within subjects data is not divided into separate conditions, please enter 1 to indicate 1 condition"
•If a user completes the participant number after exclusion (Q2) and 1 group (Q4) perhaps we can also autopopulate the N after exclusion per group? or skip the question as it is already complete. Perhaps the solution
•Q5 and Q8 (name of groups/conditions) can be hidden unless a value larger than 1 is input.
•Our group today expected for Q4 (between subjects) and Q7 (within subjects) to be more clearly linked - perhaps we can change the prompt text to make them more similar? suggestion:
How many participant groups/experimental conditions did the study have for between-subjects comparison?
How many trial types/experimental conditions did the study have for within-subjects comparison?
•Q4 and Q7 mismatch in the structure of follow-on questions:
Q4 How many participants did each group have after exclusion?
Missing alternative for comparison-wise exclusions (after Q7)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: