-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 94
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
How to do inference #66
Comments
facing with the same question, any solutions? |
Hi Could you elaborate the issue? What dataset are you using? |
Hi, i am using a dataset i created using protein interactions. But want to
use the trained model to create predictions for unseen datapoints.
…On Wed, Aug 17, 2022, 7:23 PM Woojeong Jin ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi Could you elaborate the issue? What dataset are you using?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#66 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARJIGM3GGPQXMPT2TSMH75LVZVX5XANCNFSM52DKRHQQ>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
for larger time stamps than the test set.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022, 7:25 PM MELIS OKTAYOGLU ***@***.***>
wrote:
… Hi, i am using a dataset i created using protein interactions. But want to
use the trained model to create predictions for unseen datapoints.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022, 7:23 PM Woojeong Jin ***@***.***>
wrote:
> Hi Could you elaborate the issue? What dataset are you using?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#66 (comment)>,
> or unsubscribe
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARJIGM3GGPQXMPT2TSMH75LVZVX5XANCNFSM52DKRHQQ>
> .
> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
> ***@***.***>
>
|
There should be some rules for timestamps as described in the paper:
Please follow these rules! |
Hi, i guess i wasnt clear. I can do inference for test dataset but can we
do predictions when there is no ground truth, for time stamps larger than
the test set. For example I have trained the model on time stamps 0-160,
validated for 160-180, tested for 180-200. Is there a way I can create
predictions for 200-250?
…On Wed, Aug 17, 2022, 7:35 PM Woojeong Jin ***@***.***> wrote:
There should be some rules for timestamps:
1. The timestamps are discrete integers and have equal intervals.
2. The timestamps of the test set should be after those of the
training set.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#66 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARJIGM6ZDWNT3WJJOERLGCLVZVZNLANCNFSM52DKRHQQ>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Sure you can do that. |
Could you elaborate? How to proceed after training, validating and testing?
…On Wed, Aug 17, 2022, 8:03 PM Woojeong Jin ***@***.***> wrote:
Sure you can do that.
The predicted graph in the code is for creating a graph at each time stamp.
First, you sample subjects, then relations, and then objects at a certain
time stamp.
With this set of triples, you have a graph at the time stamp.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#66 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARJIGM3REBVJ67VZUNKQ63DVZV4V3ANCNFSM52DKRHQQ>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Hello,
Could you provide some help with it?
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 3:21 AM MELIS OKTAYOGLU ***@***.***>
wrote:
… Could you elaborate? How to proceed after training, validating and
testing?
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022, 8:03 PM Woojeong Jin ***@***.***>
wrote:
> Sure you can do that.
> The predicted graph in the code is for creating a graph at each time
> stamp.
> First, you sample subjects, then relations, and then objects at a certain
> time stamp.
> With this set of triples, you have a graph at the time stamp.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#66 (comment)>,
> or unsubscribe
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARJIGM3REBVJ67VZUNKQ63DVZV4V3ANCNFSM52DKRHQQ>
> .
> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
> ***@***.***>
>
|
Hey hi, did you manage to compete this? I am curious about your use case!
|
Hello,
I am trying to do inference with the trained model with new time points. How do we do that? Can you help?
I tried using global_model.predict however it only gave the same results. Is there another way to do it?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: