Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v2021.3 - 15/09/2021: non-breaking changes #600

Closed
ghost opened this issue Sep 8, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

v2021.3 - 15/09/2021: non-breaking changes #600

ghost opened this issue Sep 8, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels
discussion This is a discussion about the Validator, any comment is welcome

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 8, 2021

v2021.3 release is scheduled for 15/09/2021 and only includes non-breaking changes, so that any INSPIRE resource passing the test in the previous release automatically passes the same test in this release. This release is the one used for the end-of-year Monitoring process.

Do you use these examples to check if some feature/fix is breaking or non-breaking for metadata conformance classes?

Thanks in advance!

@MarcoMinghini MarcoMinghini added the discussion This is a discussion about the Validator, any comment is welcome label Sep 8, 2021
@fabiovin
Copy link
Collaborator

fabiovin commented Sep 8, 2021

Dear @DeordD,

thank you for your question.

For testing purposes, we use a set of resources including the MD examples you mentioned.

You can test your metadata in staging, because, according to the release strategy, between June and September in staging there are only non-breaking changes.

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Sep 9, 2021

Dear @fabiovin,

I have validated Dataset and Network Service example and both metadata records are valid.

I have asked this question because of the following problems which could lead to "breaking-changes" even though ETS-Rules haven't changed:

It means that sometimes metadata-oriented tests for non-breaking changes aren't fully sufficient because of external dependencies, network problems, validator infrastructure, ...

@fabiovin Do you think that above mentioned issues could be potential "non-ETS"-breaking-changes?

P.S.
I am aware it is really complicated to check those things in the structured way.

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Sep 22, 2021

Hi,

could someone please answer this question?

@fabiovin Do you think that above mentioned issues could be potential "non-ETS"-breaking-changes?

Thanks!

@fabiovinci fabiovinci added user-to-fix Problem is present on user side user-fixed Problem solved on user side and removed user-to-fix Problem is present on user side user-fixed Problem solved on user side labels May 24, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discussion This is a discussion about the Validator, any comment is welcome
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants