Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SRE - Specifying what search modality the search response represents #22

Open
epcondon opened this issue Dec 1, 2021 · 2 comments
Open
Labels
Pending INSIWG Review To be reviewed at the INSIWG

Comments

@epcondon
Copy link

epcondon commented Dec 1, 2021

With the prospect that multiple searches can be launched from a single request, there appears to be no mechanism for describing in a SRE what search modality, the enclosed search result refers to. (e.g is it fingerprint or face or DNA related) The standard needs to describe.
For many organisations that separate their biometric capabilities into different systems , then the processing of the search may go to different parties/systems within an organisation so establishing that via a specific field would be important for correct routing/processing on receipt. (I am making the assumption that search outputs would be responded to as separate transactions (given that they may have separate processing/response times); if a consolidated response is envisaged this needs to be described (and would be a significant change and this type of information is still required to align search results within the one message, if both options are supported then a further field describing whether separate or consolidated response is desired might be needed )

@Jeremy-M-Int
Copy link
Collaborator

Also Type 9 could be included in the SRE to further support the match when it comes to Fingerprints.

@Jeremy-M-Int
Copy link
Collaborator

Jeremy-M-Int commented Dec 2, 2021

Search Results will be sent back for individual match per Modalities.
We also need to include scores and details on those matches.
As well as statistics (number of markers along with statistical relevance,...) for DNA Matches.

@Jeremy-M-Int Jeremy-M-Int added the Pending INSIWG Review To be reviewed at the INSIWG label May 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Pending INSIWG Review To be reviewed at the INSIWG
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants