You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The NIST Biometrics schema (biom) that the Interpol standard builds on defines a series of enumerated value for records category code in RecordCategoryCodeSimpleType (e.g 01, 02, 03) which show the intent that the elements include the leading zero. However it also defines the value as an integer rather than a string. When validating an XML transaction against the schema, it appears to allow values with out the leading zero i.e. "2" (rather than "02") as being valid. (It appears to be turning the enumerated value into an integer and the validating). This behaviour does not appear to be correct. It is suggested that this should be given an attribute of string rather than integer. A similar schema entry is FirstRecordCategoryCodeSimpleType.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
from Romas Kivaras LT to everyone: 10:04 AM
"This issue with leading zeroes is actual for binary NIST files too. NIST standard isn't clear about their usage. Traditionally leading zeroes are used in 1.3 tag, though some systems (SIS AFIS) don't allow them at all. Maybe, it would be worth to quit with leading zeroes in XML standard ?"
This idea is supported by INTERPOL staff and will be further explored.
The NIST Biometrics schema (biom) that the Interpol standard builds on defines a series of enumerated value for records category code in RecordCategoryCodeSimpleType (e.g 01, 02, 03) which show the intent that the elements include the leading zero. However it also defines the value as an integer rather than a string. When validating an XML transaction against the schema, it appears to allow values with out the leading zero i.e. "2" (rather than "02") as being valid. (It appears to be turning the enumerated value into an integer and the validating). This behaviour does not appear to be correct. It is suggested that this should be given an attribute of string rather than integer. A similar schema entry is FirstRecordCategoryCodeSimpleType.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: