Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Type 16 vs Type 20 for evidences #26

Open
Jeremy-M-Int opened this issue Dec 2, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Type 16 vs Type 20 for evidences #26

Jeremy-M-Int opened this issue Dec 2, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
Pending INSIWG Review To be reviewed at the INSIWG

Comments

@Jeremy-M-Int
Copy link
Collaborator

Vendors are proposing to use Type 16 for evidences when Type 20 was foreseen to be used.
@Jeremy-M-Int Jeremy-M-Int added the Pending INSIWG Review To be reviewed at the INSIWG label May 21, 2024
@tsaracouvert
Copy link
Collaborator

No. They must align to the standard.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Pending INSIWG Review To be reviewed at the INSIWG
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@Jeremy-M-Int @tsaracouvert