You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 23, 2023. It is now read-only.
Wouldn't it be better to use curves (i.e., shapes) of equal areas for each of the nucleotides? Right now, A and C have areas of + and - 0.25 units respectively, while G and T have areas of + and - 0.5 units respectively.
In some applications, like data storage in DNA, it is likely that optimal encodings have an equal number of each of the nucleotides, and having balanced representations could make it easier to spot imbalances and thereby compare different encodings visually.
This won't eliminate any of the other benefits stated in the blog post, but I think it will broaden the application of this visualization.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Wouldn't it be better to use curves (i.e., shapes) of equal areas for each of the nucleotides? Right now, A and C have areas of + and - 0.25 units respectively, while G and T have areas of + and - 0.5 units respectively.
In some applications, like data storage in DNA, it is likely that optimal encodings have an equal number of each of the nucleotides, and having balanced representations could make it easier to spot imbalances and thereby compare different encodings visually.
This won't eliminate any of the other benefits stated in the blog post, but I think it will broaden the application of this visualization.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: