Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UTxO-HD release #5918

Open
7 of 9 tasks
jasagredo opened this issue Jul 23, 2024 · 6 comments
Open
7 of 9 tasks

UTxO-HD release #5918

jasagredo opened this issue Jul 23, 2024 · 6 comments

Comments

@jasagredo
Copy link
Contributor

jasagredo commented Jul 23, 2024

This issue is an aggregate of dangling issues here and there about UTxO-HD, to better reflect the current status of the feature, with updated information.

Current status

The UTxO-HD feature is based currently on the 9.1 cardano-node release.

Repository Branch
ouroboros-consensus link
cardano-api link
cardano-cli link
cardano-node link

High level description of UTxO-HD and features

UTxO-HD reworks the consensus codebase to decouple the LedgerState from the UTxO set, such that the latter can be stored on the disk therefore lowering the memory consumption of the node. It has two modes of operation: in-memory and on-disk, which use the same API so should be indistinguishable from the node's point of view.

The in-memory mode should work in a very similar way to the current node, with similar performance metrics. The on-disk mode will considerably lower the memory usage of the node at the cost of some performance. This is a tradeoff users will have to consider.

Using the on-disk mode, even a node running on a Raspberry Pi 5 (8GB of RAM) was able to follow the chain.

Currently on-disk uses LMDB underneath. In the long run, the LSM-tree library is being developed to provide a more performant on-disk backend.

In terms of functionality, a UTxO-HD node does not have more functionalities than a normal node.

You can try the feature already by building cardano-node from the utxo-hd-9.1 branch. It should work both with cabal and with nix.

Copy link

This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 120 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added Stale and removed Stale labels Sep 12, 2024
@syndeton
Copy link

syndeton commented Sep 19, 2024

Should we be able to build utxo-hd-9.1.1? Or should we hold off for now?
I'm getting the following error when building .... Thanks

.fatal: Could not parse object 'c09534a2cbaeacf1d49a4a49478ccc61cb49799d'.
HEAD is now at 1751eea4e UTXO-HD 9.1
HEAD is now at bcf0e26e1 UTXO-HD 9.1
fatal: Could not parse object 'c09534a2cbaeacf1d49a4a49478ccc61cb49799d'.

Note: I'm able to build utxo-hd-9.1

@jasagredo
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm sorry, I moved the tips of the branches a bit and maybe I moved the tip of the ouroboros-consensus' utxo-hd-9.0 branch (although I though I had only added new commits on top). The source-repository-package stanzas in [email protected] branch should point to the tip of the utxo-hd-9.1 branches in cardano-cli and cardano-api and to the utxo-hd-9.0 branch in ouroboros-consensus.

@syndeton
Copy link

Just wanted to say great job with utxo-hd. It's looking like my server costs could be cut by half using it. A big help for those smaller struggling pools. You guys are heroes.

Copy link

This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 120 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Oct 21, 2024
@jasagredo jasagredo removed the Stale label Oct 22, 2024
Copy link

This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 120 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Nov 22, 2024
@jasagredo jasagredo removed the Stale label Nov 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: 🏗 In progress
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants