You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello, everyone! I added the XML file of China's carbon emission constraint to the original configuration file based on GCAM-China. However, there are some problems in the process of solving the model. As shown in the figure,
Since "Ints" in my configuration set "Value name="stop-period">-1</Value", I still got the model result in the end despite several unsuccessful period solving results. And can be successfully opened in ModelInterface.
In this case, my confusion is:
Are the results of the model reliable? I think that failure to solve in a period means that in this period, supply and demand are not in balance. When the model uses the data of this period to run next period, will it get a wrong results because it uses the wrong preivous data, even though the next period can be iterated successfully?
2 What useful information can this error give us to modify the added constraint. xml file to avoid this problem the next time we run-gcam?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello, everyone! I added the XML file of China's carbon emission constraint to the original configuration file based on GCAM-China. However, there are some problems in the process of solving the model. As shown in the figure,
Since "Ints" in my configuration set "Value name="stop-period">-1</Value", I still got the model result in the end despite several unsuccessful period solving results. And can be successfully opened in ModelInterface.
In this case, my confusion is:
2 What useful information can this error give us to modify the added constraint. xml file to avoid this problem the next time we run-gcam?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: