Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Why is the accuracy of the test for repetition lower than that in the paper? #9

Open
HYi0 opened this issue Feb 14, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Why is the accuracy of the test for repetition lower than that in the paper? #9

HYi0 opened this issue Feb 14, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@HYi0
Copy link

HYi0 commented Feb 14, 2023

I replicated the test code on FE240 dataset. In the paper, the success plot is 0.585, but in my tests, the accuracy was only 0.507. I used the pretrained which you provided. So why is this happening?
@Jee-King
Copy link
Owner

Hi,
We evaluate all trackers against pytracking.
The Analysis section in the Readme provides how to evaluate the tracker.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@Jee-King @HYi0