You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Up for discussion: in Jelly-JVM 3.0.0 we could consider renaming some packages/modules to better align with what these modules actually do:
jelly-stream -> jelly-pekko-streams
jelly-grpc -> jelly-pekko-grpc
The "stream" name part is a bit confusing, because it isn't "a module adding support for streams", but rather just an integration for Apache Pekko Streams. Another thing is that in the future we may have other modules with similar capabilities, so it would be very confusing if we had a module named jelly-stream. Same goes for gRPC.
To investigate: can we communicate this renaming somehow to Maven?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Up for discussion: in Jelly-JVM 3.0.0 we could consider renaming some packages/modules to better align with what these modules actually do:
jelly-stream
->jelly-pekko-streams
jelly-grpc
->jelly-pekko-grpc
The "stream" name part is a bit confusing, because it isn't "a module adding support for streams", but rather just an integration for Apache Pekko Streams. Another thing is that in the future we may have other modules with similar capabilities, so it would be very confusing if we had a module named
jelly-stream
. Same goes for gRPC.To investigate: can we communicate this renaming somehow to Maven?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: