Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Plotting with Plots.jl does not work anymore #5040

Closed
andreasvarga opened this issue Jan 15, 2025 · 2 comments
Closed

Plotting with Plots.jl does not work anymore #5040

andreasvarga opened this issue Jan 15, 2025 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@andreasvarga
Copy link

I performed several experiments with the BifurcationKit.jl package and also generated some plots. However, after a certain moment, I was not able to plot anything more, all generated plots were blank windows with a title like GKS QtTerm(28). I recall the last successful plot had GKS QtTerm(12)!

I am obtaining such plots, with Julia 10.4.2, just typing

using Plots
plot(rand(5))

I updated to Julia 11.2 and receive the same.

I would appreciate any hint how to recover from this status.

@BeastyBlacksmith
Copy link
Member

BeastyBlacksmith commented Jan 16, 2025

Can you give us the output when you run versioninfo()?

Did you get any other output in the terminal?

CC @jheinen

@andreasvarga
Copy link
Author

After restarting Windows 11, Plots works as expected. The version which I used were:

julia> versioninfo()
Julia Version 1.10.4
Commit 48d4fd4843 (2024-06-04 10:41 UTC)
Build Info:
  Official https://julialang.org/ release
Platform Info:
  OS: Windows (x86_64-w64-mingw32)
  CPU: 16 × Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-10700 CPU @ 2.90GHz
  WORD_SIZE: 64
  LIBM: libopenlibm
  LLVM: libLLVM-15.0.7 (ORCJIT, skylake)
Threads: 1 default, 0 interactive, 1 GC (on 16 virtual cores)

and

julia> versioninfo()
Julia Version 1.11.2
Commit 5e9a32e7af (2024-12-01 20:02 UTC)
Build Info:
  Official https://julialang.org/ release
Platform Info:
  OS: Windows (x86_64-w64-mingw32)
  CPU: 16 × Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-10700 CPU @ 2.90GHz
  WORD_SIZE: 64
  LLVM: libLLVM-16.0.6 (ORCJIT, skylake)
Threads: 1 default, 0 interactive, 1 GC (on 16 virtual cores)

I intended to close this issue, although I found the behaviour very disturbing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants