From 24a987413fd234b994dff27b8a4d4a667ea43667 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Elrod <elrodc@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2023 14:49:48 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] `elsize` should be defined on type

There is a default `elsize(A::AbstractArray) = elsize(typeof(A))` fallback in `Base`.
---
 src/ptr_array.jl | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/ptr_array.jl b/src/ptr_array.jl
index 1f7543f..d200887 100644
--- a/src/ptr_array.jl
+++ b/src/ptr_array.jl
@@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ end
 
 @inline Base.unsafe_convert(::Type{Ptr{T}}, A::AbstractStrideArray) where {T} =
   Base.unsafe_convert(Ptr{T}, pointer(A))
-@inline Base.elsize(::AbstractStrideArray{T}) where {T} = sizeof(T)
+@inline Base.elsize(::Type{<:AbstractStrideArray{T}}) where {T} = sizeof(T)
 
 @inline ArrayInterface.static_size(A::AbstractPtrStrideArray) =
   getfield(A, :sizes)