You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have a question as an extension to Issue #8 .
I understand that the provided pretrained model can be used recursively to produce results for more moments than t=0.5.
However as far as I understood, according to the paper and your responses, it seems like the conclusion leads to: 'although the provided model is for predicting an intermediate frame t=0.5, it can be rebuilt for estimating frame at random t.'
I thus tried to reproduce your model for arbitrary time t based on your code and figured that it doesn't seem possible to be extended for arbitrary time.
Specifically, I doubt that Eq. 15 of the paper cannot hold for arbitrary time t.
The pixel intensity seems to be intended to sum to 1. The equation holds as long as t=0.5, but for example, when t=0.3, M_t1=0, M_t0=1, the pixel intensity becomes 1.4 .
I wanted to ask if there is anything that I misunderstood or got wrong...
Please, correct me if I am wrong.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, thanks for your awesome work.
I have a question as an extension to Issue #8 .
I understand that the provided pretrained model can be used recursively to produce results for more moments than t=0.5.
However as far as I understood, according to the paper and your responses, it seems like the conclusion leads to: 'although the provided model is for predicting an intermediate frame t=0.5, it can be rebuilt for estimating frame at random t.'
I thus tried to reproduce your model for arbitrary time t based on your code and figured that it doesn't seem possible to be extended for arbitrary time.
Specifically, I doubt that Eq. 15 of the paper cannot hold for arbitrary time t.
The pixel intensity seems to be intended to sum to 1. The equation holds as long as t=0.5, but for example, when t=0.3, M_t1=0, M_t0=1, the pixel intensity becomes 1.4 .
I wanted to ask if there is anything that I misunderstood or got wrong...
Please, correct me if I am wrong.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: