You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am working on re-implementing the training processing on our own dataset for comparison experiments.
The performance of retrained model appears unusual when using the sum of census loss and Charbonnier L1 loss, as mentioned in the paper.
Do we also need to use the optical flow smoothness constraint loss, similar to BMBC?
It would be great if you could provide the details of loss function and the weight details.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
yingc1309
changed the title
The weight of census loss and Charbonnier L1 loss
The weight details for the census loss and Charbonnier L1 loss
Jan 26, 2024
I am working on re-implementing the training processing on our own dataset for comparison experiments.
The performance of retrained model appears unusual when using the sum of census loss and Charbonnier L1 loss, as mentioned in the paper.
Do we also need to use the optical flow smoothness constraint loss, similar to BMBC?
It would be great if you could provide the details of loss function and the weight details.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: