Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Placeholder API support for item creation only. #104

Open
JustBru00 opened this issue Feb 5, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

Placeholder API support for item creation only. #104

JustBru00 opened this issue Feb 5, 2019 · 3 comments
Assignees
@JustBru00
Labels
Addition Request Back Burner Issues that are technically possible but will require more work than it is worth at this time. Low Priority Possible
Milestone
v4.0

Comments

@JustBru00
Copy link
Owner

First requested in issue #86:

  1. Add (mvdw)PlaceholderAPI support, so we can put placeholders in our items

Command:

  • No special command, just include the placeholder in /rename or /lore, etc..
@JustBru00 JustBru00 added this to the v3.6 milestone Feb 5, 2019
@JustBru00 JustBru00 self-assigned this Feb 5, 2019
@Flavourized Flavourized mentioned this issue Feb 5, 2019
Closed
@JustBru00
Copy link
Owner Author

JustBru00 commented Feb 5, 2019 •
edited
Loading

https://www.spigotmc.org/resources/mvdwplaceholderapi.11182/
https://github.com/Maximvdw/MVdWPlaceholderAPIExample/blob/master/src/main/java/be/maximvdw/placeholderapiexample/PlaceholderAPIExample.java

@JustBru00
Copy link
Owner Author

Debating whether or not it is worth adding. Every command will need edited individually.

JustBru00 added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 5, 2019
@JustBru00
Started on #104
07f38d1
@JustBru00
Copy link
Owner Author

Probably going to push this to the back burner. Not very important for item names since it will only work during item creation.

JustBru00 added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 12, 2019
@JustBru00
Removed references to MDVW api. Pushing #104 to the back burner.
0d383a3
@JustBru00 JustBru00 added Back Burner Issues that are technically possible but will require more work than it is worth at this time. Low Priority and removed TODO Medium Priority labels Apr 12, 2019
@JustBru00 JustBru00 modified the milestones: v3.6, v4.0 Apr 12, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@JustBru00 JustBru00

Labels
Addition Request Back Burner Issues that are technically possible but will require more work than it is worth at this time. Low Priority Possible
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v4.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@JustBru00