We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
When creating a Parallel Jim Culver (with Laid to Rest as backside) deck, the spirit deck's requirements is not correctly enforced.
Example deck: https://arkhamdb.com/deck/view/3425307 I put all the allies in side deck.
Please let me know if I can provide any help.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Side deck I meant to track upgrades and whatnot.
For ArkhamCards app I've been storing the spirit deck in the meta block (as a csv of card codes) in a field named "extra_deck".
The json data also has a set of fields to track the rules, but they'd need to be loaded by they database.
Sorry, something went wrong.
I was about to say that - See attached link 1. The data source uses side_deck_options and side_deck_requirements.
side_deck_options
side_deck_requirements
It seems to be the only card using that field, if you search for the field name.
The field is not defined in the schema1. Maybe there's still chance to rename it?
Yeah, renaming it on the card is an option still, it hasn't been used or hooked up anywhere yet.
Keeping the meta/extra_deck convention would be nice since some decks already use that.
No branches or pull requests
When creating a Parallel Jim Culver (with Laid to Rest as backside) deck, the spirit deck's requirements is not correctly enforced.
Example deck: https://arkhamdb.com/deck/view/3425307 I put all the allies in side deck.
Please let me know if I can provide any help.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: