-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 294
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixes #36310 - Migrate off ContentViews generated for repository export #11144
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry for the delay in updating the other PR. Your changes mostly look good to me... could you explain the benefit of using the FakeCVECF class here?
So the FakeCVECF is so that we don't have to use validations that belong to CVECF. I kept getting hit with no content source migration errors because of this => https://github.com/Katello/katello/blob/master/app/models/katello/content_view_environment_content_facet.rb#L10 SmartProxy is nil during migration since its org scoped (even though the content_source_id exists). So when you save you hit this error. |
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ def enabled_repos | |||
|
|||
#api :POST, "/environments/:environment_id/consumers", N_("Register a consumer in environment") | |||
def consumer_create | |||
host = Katello::RegistrationManager.process_registration(rhsm_params, find_content_view_environments) | |||
host = Katello::RegistrationManager.process_registration(rhsm_params, content_view_environments) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it should be find_content_view_environments
(see L#321 below)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Moved it back. I don't see this path being called from subman but may be some one who is curl posting to this URL directly will be calling this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, still the same issue:
[ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid] exception expected, not
Class: <ActiveModel::UnknownAttributeError>
Message: <"unknown attribute 'content_view' for Katello::ActivationKey.">
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To clarify, this is what it was originally before my PR:
def consumer_create
host = Katello::RegistrationManager.process_registration(rhsm_params, find_content_view_environments) # note second arg here, calls find_content_view_environments method which is defined later in the same file
host.reload
update_host_registered_through(host, request.headers)
render :json => Resources::Candlepin::Consumer.get(host.subscription_facet.uuid)
end
My PR had:
def consumer_create
content_view_environments = find_content_view_environments # content_view_environments is defined here
if content_view_environments.any? { |cve| cve.content_view.generated_for_repository_export? }
render json: {
displayMessage: _("Cannot register with a content view generated for repository export"),
errors: [_("Cannot register with a content view generated for repository export")]
}, status: :bad_request
return
end
host = Katello::RegistrationManager.process_registration(rhsm_params, content_view_environments) # second arg here now uses above definition
host.reload
update_host_registered_through(host, request.headers)
render :json => Resources::Candlepin::Consumer.get(host.subscription_facet.uuid)
end
And yours had:
def consumer_create
host = Katello::RegistrationManager.process_registration(rhsm_params, content_view_environments) # but content_view_environments wasn't defined as in mine
host.reload
update_host_registered_through(host, request.headers)
render :json => Resources::Candlepin::Consumer.get(host.subscription_facet.uuid)
end
So I wasn't suggesting that you need to reinstate my version of the change, just that you never FULLY reverted it to the original
That said, it seems the current issue in the tests is occurring regardless. I'm not sure what is the cause
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
[ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid] exception expected, not
Class: ActiveModel::UnknownAttributeError
Message: <"unknown attribute 'content_view' for Katello::ActivationKey.">
can you share the stack trace for this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can you share the stack trace for this.
I kicked off a re-run in CI of the failed tests to be sure:
Error: Failure: test_0011_should not allow generated content view to be associated with activation key
[ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid] exception expected, not
Class: <ActiveModel::UnknownAttributeError>
Message: <"unknown attribute 'content_view' for Katello::ActivationKey.">
---Backtrace---
katello/test/models/activation_key_test.rb:114:in `block (2 levels) in <class:ActivationKeyTest>'
katello/test/models/activation_key_test.rb:113:in `block in <class:ActivationKeyTest>'
---------------
It looks like the test needs to try updating convent_view_environments
instead
Author: William Bradford Clark <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Partha Aji <[email protected]> Ensures no Hosts remain on ContentViews generated for repository export. If doing so would leave the Host a valid ContentView, the Default Organization View is assigned to it. Also implements additional filtering in the candlepin proxies controller, and several additional tests.
d053fe5
to
f8d3de3
Compare
test "should not allow generated content view to be associated with activation key" do | ||
generated_cv = FactoryBot.create(:katello_content_view, :generated_for => :repository_export, :organization => @dev_view.organization) | ||
|
||
exception = assert_raises(ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid) do | ||
@dev_key.update!(content_view: generated_cv) | ||
end | ||
|
||
assert_match(/Generated content views cannot be assigned to hosts or activation keys/, exception.message) | ||
end |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
test "should not allow generated content view to be associated with activation key" do | |
generated_cv = FactoryBot.create(:katello_content_view, :generated_for => :repository_export, :organization => @dev_view.organization) | |
exception = assert_raises(ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid) do | |
@dev_key.update!(content_view: generated_cv) | |
end | |
assert_match(/Generated content views cannot be assigned to hosts or activation keys/, exception.message) | |
end | |
test "should not allow generated content view to be associated with activation key" do | |
generated_cv = FactoryBot.create(:katello_content_view, :generated_for => :repository_export, :organization => @dev_view.organization) | |
generated_cve = FactoryBot.create(:katello_content_view_environment, :content_view => generated_cv, :environment => katello_environments(:library)) | |
exception = assert_raises(ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid) do | |
@dev_key.update!(content_view_environments: [generated_cve]) | |
end | |
assert_match(/Generated content views cannot be assigned to hosts or activation keys/, exception.message) | |
end |
Something along these lines looks necessary due to the changes in 746bda7#diff-d7dd2b8980210ef5f81a8ac4d2bfd2384210cf326a1b165a5b6869b0c661a241
Ensures no Hosts remain on ContentViews generated for repository export. If doing so would leave the Host without a valid ContentView, the Default Organization View is assigned to it.
Also implements additional filtering in the candlepin proxies controller, and several additional tests.
What considerations are taken in implementing this pull request?
At least some validation was already done with c33da7a
What are the testing steps for this pull request?
Apply patch
Run migration
Verify that your cve got deleted from the host