This chapter is an overview of the Fixed-Function Vertex Processing chapter in the spec to help give a high level understanding of how an application can map data to the vertex shader when using a graphics pipeline.
It is also important to remember that Vulkan is a tool that can be used in different ways. The following are examples for educational purposes of how vertex data can be laid out.
A binding
is tied to a position in the vertex buffer from which the vertex shader will start reading data out of during a vkCmdDraw*
call. Changing the bindings
does not require making any alterations to an app’s vertex shader source code.
As an example, the following code matches the diagram of how bindings
work.
// Using the same buffer for both bindings in this example
VkBuffer buffers[] = { vertex_buffer, vertex_buffer };
VkDeviceSize offsets[] = { 8, 0 };
vkCmdBindVertexBuffers(
my_command_buffer, // commandBuffer
0, // firstBinding
2, // bindingCount
buffers, // pBuffers
offsets, // pOffsets
);
The following examples show various ways to set your binding
and location
values depending on your data input.
For the first example, the per-vertex attribute data will look like:
struct Vertex {
float x, y, z;
uint8_t u, v;
};
The pipeline create info code will look roughly like:
const VkVertexInputBindingDescription binding = {
0, // binding
sizeof(Vertex), // stride
VK_VERTEX_INPUT_RATE_VERTEX // inputRate
};
const VkVertexInputAttributeDescription attributes[] = {
{
0, // location
binding.binding, // binding
VK_FORMAT_R32G32B32_SFLOAT, // format
0 // offset
},
{
1, // location
binding.binding, // binding
VK_FORMAT_R8G8_UNORM, // format
3 * sizeof(float) // offset
}
};
const VkPipelineVertexInputStateCreateInfo info = {
1, // vertexBindingDescriptionCount
&binding, // pVertexBindingDescriptions
2, // vertexAttributeDescriptionCount
&attributes[0] // pVertexAttributeDescriptions
};
The GLSL code that would consume this could look like
layout(location = 0) in vec3 inPos;
layout(location = 1) in uvec2 inUV;
This example examines a case where the vertex data is not tightly packed and has extra padding.
struct Vertex {
float x, y, z, pad;
uint8_t u, v;
};
The only change needed is to adjust the offset at pipeline creation
1, // location
binding.binding, // binding
VK_FORMAT_R8G8_UNORM, // format
- 3 * sizeof(float) // offset
+ 4 * sizeof(float) // offset
As this will now set the correct offset for where u
and v
are read in from.
Sometimes data is not interleaved, in this case, you might have the following
float position_data[] = { /*....*/ };
uint8_t uv_data[] = { /*....*/ };
In this case, there will be 2 bindings, but still 2 locations
const VkVertexInputBindingDescription bindings[] = {
{
0, // binding
3 * sizeof(float), // stride
VK_VERTEX_INPUT_RATE_VERTEX // inputRate
},
{
1, // binding
2 * sizeof(uint8_t), // stride
VK_VERTEX_INPUT_RATE_VERTEX // inputRate
}
};
const VkVertexInputAttributeDescription attributes[] = {
{
0, // location
bindings[0].binding, // binding
VK_FORMAT_R32G32B32_SFLOAT, // format
0 // offset
},
{
1, // location
bindings[1].binding, // binding
VK_FORMAT_R8G8_UNORM, // format
0 // offset
}
};
const VkPipelineVertexInputStateCreateInfo info = {
2, // vertexBindingDescriptionCount
&bindings[0], // pVertexBindingDescriptions
2, // vertexAttributeDescriptionCount
&attributes[0] // pVertexAttributeDescriptions
};
The GLSL code does not change from Example A
layout(location = 0) in vec3 inPos;
layout(location = 1) in uvec2 inUV;
This example is to help illustrate that the binding
and location
are independent of each other.
In this example, the data of the vertices is laid out in two buffers provided in the following format:
struct typeA {
float x, y, z; // position
uint8_t u, v; // UV
};
struct typeB {
float x, y, z; // normal
};
typeA a[] = { /*....*/ };
typeB b[] = { /*....*/ };
and the shader being used has the interface of
layout(location = 0) in vec3 inPos;
layout(location = 1) in vec3 inNormal;
layout(location = 2) in uvec2 inUV;
The following can still be mapped properly by setting the VkVertexInputBindingDescription
and VkVertexInputAttributeDescription
accordingly:
const VkVertexInputBindingDescription bindings[] = {
{
0, // binding
sizeof(typeA), // stride
VK_VERTEX_INPUT_RATE_VERTEX // inputRate
},
{
1, // binding
sizeof(typeB), // stride
VK_VERTEX_INPUT_RATE_VERTEX // inputRate
}
};
const VkVertexInputAttributeDescription attributes[] = {
{
0, // location
bindings[0].binding, // binding
VK_FORMAT_R32G32B32_SFLOAT, // format
0 // offset
},
{
1, // location
bindings[1].binding, // binding
VK_FORMAT_R32G32B32_SFLOAT, // format
0 // offset
},
{
2, // location
bindings[0].binding, // binding
VK_FORMAT_R8G8_UNORM, // format
3 * sizeof(float) // offset
}
};
The VkVertexInputAttributeDescription::format
can be the cause of confusion. The format
field just describes the size and type of the data the shader should read in.
The reason for using the VkFormat
values is they are well defined and match the input layouts of the vertex shader.
For this example the vertex data is just four floats:
struct Vertex {
float a, b, c, d;
};
The data being read will be overlapped from how the format
and offset
is set
const VkVertexInputBindingDescription binding = {
0, // binding
sizeof(Vertex), // stride
VK_VERTEX_INPUT_RATE_VERTEX // inputRate
};
const VkVertexInputAttributeDescription attributes[] = {
{
0, // location
binding.binding, // binding
VK_FORMAT_R32G32_SFLOAT, // format - Reads in two 32-bit signed floats ('a' and 'b')
0 // offset
},
{
1, // location
binding.binding, // binding
VK_FORMAT_R32G32B32_SFLOAT, // format - Reads in three 32-bit signed floats ('b', 'c', and 'd')
1 * sizeof(float) // offset
}
};
When reading in the data in the shader the value will be the same where it overlaps
layout(location = 0) in vec2 in0;
layout(location = 1) in vec2 in1;
// in0.y == in1.x
It is important to notice that in1
is a vec2
while the input attribute is VK_FORMAT_R32G32B32_SFLOAT
which doesn’t fully match. According to the spec:
If the vertex shader has fewer components, the extra components are discarded.
So in this case, the last component of location 1 (d
) is discarded and would not be read in by the shader.
The spec explains more in detail about the Component
assignment. The following is a general overview of the topic.
Each location
in the VkVertexInputAttributeDescription
has 4 components. The example above already showed that extra components from the format
are discarded when the shader input has fewer components.
VK_FORMAT_R32G32B32_SFLOAT
has 3 components while avec2
has only 2
For the opposite case, the spec has a table showing how it will expand missing components.
This means the example of
layout(location = 0) in vec3 inPos;
layout(location = 1) in uvec2 inUV;
would fill the examples above with the following
layout(location = 0) in vec4 inPos;
layout(location = 1) in uvec4 inUV;