You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 2, 2020. It is now read-only.
It isn't reliable enough to be considered a "failure" (yet?) so it's not looked at by submitters, "all checks are green" And when you do read the suggestions, it just says, "power in/out should not be invisible" It doesn't mention the other option, "should this pin be passive?"
Was the invisible power input pin already stacked? Because that is the only case where we could make this suggestion. If it is not stacked then the error is that it is invisible. If it is stacked then the error is that it has potentially the wrong type.
It isn't reliable enough to be considered a "failure" (yet?) so it's not looked at by submitters, "all checks are green" And when you do read the suggestions, it just says, "power in/out should not be invisible" It doesn't mention the other option, "should this pin be passive?"
https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-library-utils/blob/master/schlib/rules/S4_3.py#L135 is correctly idenfitying the "power in/out+passive" stack that's required, when it's correct, but it doesn't suggest it as a solution when it's wrong.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: