Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expand QA extended content to create sets driven from subgraph #92

Open
elrayle opened this issue Apr 12, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

Expand QA extended content to create sets driven from subgraph #92

elrayle opened this issue Apr 12, 2019 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
Low Priority low priority - on the back burner and may not be done qa feature requires code change refactor

Comments

@elrayle
Copy link
Member

elrayle commented Apr 12, 2019

See QA Issue: samvera/questioning_authority#269

@elrayle elrayle self-assigned this Apr 12, 2019
@elrayle elrayle added the qa feature requires code change label Apr 12, 2019
@elrayle
Copy link
Member Author

elrayle commented Apr 12, 2019

@sfolsom @hudajkhan Can you review the proposed design?

@hudajkhan
Copy link

From the interface end, the proposed solution follows the same pattern as before (an array of properties) but now adds in the possibility of an element that is "sets" which includes multiple arrays where each array has properties that together define the same object/context node. I think we can work with that so am ok with the design at this point.

@zimeon
Copy link
Member

zimeon commented Apr 19, 2019

@sfolsom -- would be good to understand which use cases / authorities we need this facility for

@elrayle elrayle added refactor Low Priority low priority - on the back burner and may not be done labels May 12, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Low Priority low priority - on the back burner and may not be done qa feature requires code change refactor
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants