Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can‘t get reasonable results on ScanNet. #49

Open
XXXCARREY opened this issue Dec 4, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Can‘t get reasonable results on ScanNet. #49

XXXCARREY opened this issue Dec 4, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@XXXCARREY
Copy link

Hello! Thank you for your amazing work. I applied GS-ICP SLAM to the ScanNet dataset using the same parameters as those for the TUM dataset (considering they are both real-world scene datasets), but I did not obtain satisfactory results. For example, in scene0000_00, the ATE_RMSE is 120.43, and in scene0059_00, an error occurred, and I could not obtain a result. Can this issue be resolved by adjusting the parameters, or does this method indeed have some limitations beyond the ScanNet dataset?

Method 0000 0059 0106 0169 0207 FPS
GS-ICP SLAM 120.43 N/A 126.21 N/A 74.73 ~10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant