You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello! Thank you for your amazing work. I applied GS-ICP SLAM to the ScanNet dataset using the same parameters as those for the TUM dataset (considering they are both real-world scene datasets), but I did not obtain satisfactory results. For example, in scene0000_00, the ATE_RMSE is 120.43, and in scene0059_00, an error occurred, and I could not obtain a result. Can this issue be resolved by adjusting the parameters, or does this method indeed have some limitations beyond the ScanNet dataset?
Method
0000
0059
0106
0169
0207
FPS
GS-ICP SLAM
120.43
N/A
126.21
N/A
74.73
~10
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello! Thank you for your amazing work. I applied GS-ICP SLAM to the ScanNet dataset using the same parameters as those for the TUM dataset (considering they are both real-world scene datasets), but I did not obtain satisfactory results. For example, in scene0000_00, the ATE_RMSE is 120.43, and in scene0059_00, an error occurred, and I could not obtain a result. Can this issue be resolved by adjusting the parameters, or does this method indeed have some limitations beyond the ScanNet dataset?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: