Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Evaluate Tool Direction and Useability #26

Open
ctcncgr opened this issue Apr 10, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Evaluate Tool Direction and Useability #26

ctcncgr opened this issue Apr 10, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@ctcncgr
Copy link
Member

ctcncgr commented Apr 10, 2018

  1. Do the views and statistics make sense?
  2. Are there obvious things missing that researchers will use?
  3. How should the tool let you access the data?
    • Should you be able to directly download?
    • How should bulk retrieval be handled if requested from multiple domains?
    • What would a search interface and it's response look like (Table, graph, icicle, combination, etc...)?
  4. How should the current views be accessed?
    • Main page with search and UI nav on top for specific type views? (Sensible?)
    • Land on genome type view, navigate from there?
    • Force type selection, then navigate from there?
  5. How would one get to this page?
    • How does it link from the new LegFed?
  6. How would one use the tool to do something interesting?
    • IGV
    • File Discovery Using Label(s), FileName(s) and Relationship(s)
    • Assembly and Annotation Global Stats Comparison
    • Linkouts
      • Cyverse (if available)
      • IGV
      • Other visualizers?
      • Intermine for the organism?
      • Intermine gene lists?
@adf-ncgr
Copy link
Member

thanks Connor, this looks like a great set of questions to serve as a driver for the grand premiere. hope I did not seem too hesitant to put your work on display, I really just wanted to get people thinking about the question of how to put new stuff out in such a way that it has the maximum likelihood of having an impact...

@ctcncgr
Copy link
Member Author

ctcncgr commented Apr 10, 2018

Not at all. I think there are still many questions.

In fact, I think I realized a major issue on the call today when we were talking about what it can display vs what it can search. I think the main interface needs to be able to display a variety of file types in some simple but interesting way to the user (easier said then done, but I think I have some ideas) that is searchable and takes advantage of the graph and the dynamic search aspects. The file type specific views are then selectable from the nav UI, and/or searchable based on type and/or taxa/whatever labels (but not a mix of file types). Currently I really only use the graph on the frontend to do the discovery for the IGV visualization and get the data to load the page, but the API can do much more than this.

I think this is a sensible direction.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants