-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 982
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Automated regression testing #86
Comments
What are some of the ways in which LuaJIT deviates from Lua? |
Wasn't @MikePall going to clean up his test suite and upload it online? |
Truthfully, if @MikePall has no time to clean it up, it might be better to provide it in 'raw' form such that somehow might clean it up than to have nothing at all. I am new to LuaJIT but I am certainly surprised that such a successful project has survived so long without a proper regression suite. |
@pmatos It has a regression suite. We just can't see it. :) |
@drbo: From top of my head:
|
NB: This can be used as test suite as well: https://github.com/fperrad/lua-TestMore/tree/master/test_lua51 |
@agladysh This looks pretty good, thanks! |
Fix divide by -1.
Resolves LuaJIT#86. Signed-off-by: Siddhesh Poyarekar <[email protected]>
Currently, hacking on LuaJIT code is difficult because there seems to be no way to test it.
Some thoughts:
Other ideas?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: