Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reorder/Renew Settings menu #447

Open
Lurkars opened this issue Nov 22, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Reorder/Renew Settings menu #447

Lurkars opened this issue Nov 22, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request pending Additional information/feedback requested

Comments

@Lurkars
Copy link
Owner

Lurkars commented Nov 22, 2023

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

The current Settings menu is very bloated and not sorted very well.

Describe the solution you'd like

A clever reorder or a complete new structure to the settings menu. In general it's important to distinct from settings impacting game-play and only client side visual changes.

Describe alternatives you've considered

This is definitely out of my UX scope. So I am happy about community proposals on how to do this.

Additional context

No response

@Lurkars Lurkars added enhancement New feature or request pending Additional information/feedback requested labels Nov 22, 2023
@Sr0sh
Copy link

Sr0sh commented Nov 23, 2023

How about taking a page from video games and separating out setting menus?

Like having one menu for “Gameplay Settings” and one for “Display Settings.”

@kimmathiassen
Copy link

For me a search option would solve this problem problems.
A common scenario would be that someone in my party should active the new feature to see shield and retaliation icons.
But I cant remember what the setting is called, but a few searches will find easily find me the setting.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request pending Additional information/feedback requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants