Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Better pitch / f0 tracking #234

Open
turian opened this issue Nov 4, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Better pitch / f0 tracking #234

turian opened this issue Nov 4, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@turian
Copy link

turian commented Nov 4, 2024 •
edited
Loading

I see that your fork is very interested in improved f0/pitch tracking.

See my comment on the original repo, RVC-Project#2373, where I write:

Consider using the pitch trackers from penn which might be higher quality.

NOTES:

  • Use the dev branch of that repo, according to their README.
  • The paper shows that FCNF0++ and DeepF0++ are almost equally good, without must statistical difference detected in their experiments.

[edit: I seem to recall that DeepF0++ uses less memory than FCNF0++, but it's worth checking this again]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@turian