Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 7, 2024. It is now read-only.

Improve unit test coverage #56

Open
Gudahtt opened this issue Jan 24, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

Improve unit test coverage #56

Gudahtt opened this issue Jan 24, 2022 · 4 comments
Assignees
@adonesky1
Labels
type-enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Gudahtt
Copy link
Member

Gudahtt commented Jan 24, 2022

We should strive for 100% unit test coverage, and to cover all input boundary conditions.
@Gudahtt Gudahtt added the type-enhancement New feature or request label Jan 24, 2022
@adonesky1
Copy link
Contributor

@Gudahtt should we migrate the test suite to Jest so we can get test coverage reporting?

@mcmire
Copy link

mcmire commented Apr 4, 2022

@adonesky1 Yes, we should definitely do this! I don't think there's any reason we shouldn't be using Jest now.

@adonesky1
Copy link
Contributor

I'm going to update to use Jest cc @mcmire @Gudahtt

@adonesky1
Copy link
Contributor

Current coverage:
Screen Shot 2022-04-15 at 12 07 49 PM

@adonesky1 adonesky1 self-assigned this Apr 18, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@adonesky1 adonesky1

Labels
type-enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@mcmire @Gudahtt @adonesky1