You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A \delta seems missing in Eq.6 of the paper. Have you tested on all the sequences and other dataset.
Recommend to ref LIBRE: The Multiple 3D LiDAR Dataset.
VLP64 may have a low precise for long distance measurement.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@hahakid , thank you for your careful reading! Yes, actually there is a typo, I will fix it in the final version of the paper.
I've taken a look at LIBRE, a very relevant paper, many thanks! About testing metric on other datasets -- that is the scope of future work, the current state is more MVP/proof-of-concept on well-know KITTI. Next iterations, of course, will be supported by more evaluation on different LiDAR datasets, as well depth camera datasets, because the current metric algorithm is not limited to only LiDAR 3D data.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
A \delta seems missing in Eq.6 of the paper. Have you tested on all the sequences and other dataset.
Recommend to ref LIBRE: The Multiple 3D LiDAR Dataset.
VLP64 may have a low precise for long distance measurement.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: