Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider offering a more permissive license for luminare? #10

Closed
yujinqiu opened this issue Sep 3, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Consider offering a more permissive license for luminare? #10

yujinqiu opened this issue Sep 3, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@yujinqiu
Copy link

yujinqiu commented Sep 3, 2024

Dear Luminare team,
As an indie macOS developer, I'm impressed by Luminare's UI design and would love to use it in my app. However, the GPL license prevents me from doing so, as I prefer to keep my app closed-source.
While I understand Luminare is a core part of Loop and GPL protects your product well, would you consider offering a more permissive license option (like MIT or Apache 2.0) for Luminare library?
This could broaden its impact and potentially attract more contributors.
I appreciate your work and time considering this request, thanks.

@MrKai77
Copy link
Owner

MrKai77 commented Sep 3, 2024

Hello @yujinqiu!

Thank you for reaching out and for your kind words about our work! As fellow indie macOS developers, we share your commitment to crafting quality software and appreciate the need to balance openness with safeguarding our work. While we recognize the appeal of a more permissive license, we also value ensuring that the work we’ve put into Luminare is credited and safeguarded appropriately. While we have confidence in your intentions, we’ve opted for the GNU GPLv3 license to ensure that the work remains respected and protected in all scenarios.

We hope you understand our position, and we appreciate your understanding and support :D

@MrKai77 MrKai77 closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Sep 3, 2024
SenpaiHunters pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants