-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
/
utsname_sysctl.c
147 lines (130 loc) · 3.39 KB
/
utsname_sysctl.c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
/*
* Copyright (C) 2007
*
* Author: Eric Biederman <[email protected]>
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
* published by the Free Software Foundation, version 2 of the
* License.
*/
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/uts.h>
#include <linux/utsname.h>
#include <linux/sysctl.h>
#include <linux/wait.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL
static void *get_uts(struct ctl_table *table)
{
char *which = table->data;
struct uts_namespace *uts_ns;
uts_ns = current->nsproxy->uts_ns;
which = (which - (char *)&init_uts_ns) + (char *)uts_ns;
return which;
}
/*
* Special case of dostring for the UTS structure. This has locks
* to observe. Should this be in kernel/sys.c ????
*/
static int proc_do_uts_string(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
{
struct ctl_table uts_table;
int r;
char tmp_data[__NEW_UTS_LEN + 1];
memcpy(&uts_table, table, sizeof(uts_table));
uts_table.data = tmp_data;
/*
* Buffer the value in tmp_data so that proc_dostring() can be called
* without holding any locks.
* We also need to read the original value in the write==1 case to
* support partial writes.
*/
down_read(&uts_sem);
memcpy(tmp_data, get_uts(table), sizeof(tmp_data));
up_read(&uts_sem);
r = proc_dostring(&uts_table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
if (write) {
/*
* Write back the new value.
* Note that, since we dropped uts_sem, the result can
* theoretically be incorrect if there are two parallel writes
* at non-zero offsets to the same sysctl.
*/
down_write(&uts_sem);
memcpy(get_uts(table), tmp_data, sizeof(tmp_data));
up_write(&uts_sem);
proc_sys_poll_notify(table->poll);
}
return r;
}
#else
#define proc_do_uts_string NULL
#endif
static DEFINE_CTL_TABLE_POLL(hostname_poll);
static DEFINE_CTL_TABLE_POLL(domainname_poll);
static struct ctl_table uts_kern_table[] = {
{
.procname = "ostype",
.data = init_uts_ns.name.sysname,
.maxlen = sizeof(init_uts_ns.name.sysname),
.mode = 0444,
.proc_handler = proc_do_uts_string,
},
{
.procname = "osrelease",
.data = init_uts_ns.name.release,
.maxlen = sizeof(init_uts_ns.name.release),
.mode = 0444,
.proc_handler = proc_do_uts_string,
},
{
.procname = "version",
.data = init_uts_ns.name.version,
.maxlen = sizeof(init_uts_ns.name.version),
.mode = 0444,
.proc_handler = proc_do_uts_string,
},
{
.procname = "hostname",
.data = init_uts_ns.name.nodename,
.maxlen = sizeof(init_uts_ns.name.nodename),
.mode = 0644,
.proc_handler = proc_do_uts_string,
.poll = &hostname_poll,
},
{
.procname = "domainname",
.data = init_uts_ns.name.domainname,
.maxlen = sizeof(init_uts_ns.name.domainname),
.mode = 0644,
.proc_handler = proc_do_uts_string,
.poll = &domainname_poll,
},
{}
};
static struct ctl_table uts_root_table[] = {
{
.procname = "kernel",
.mode = 0555,
.child = uts_kern_table,
},
{}
};
#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL
/*
* Notify userspace about a change in a certain entry of uts_kern_table,
* identified by the parameter proc.
*/
void uts_proc_notify(enum uts_proc proc)
{
struct ctl_table *table = &uts_kern_table[proc];
proc_sys_poll_notify(table->poll);
}
#endif
static int __init utsname_sysctl_init(void)
{
register_sysctl_table(uts_root_table);
return 0;
}
device_initcall(utsname_sysctl_init);