You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 4, 2021. It is now read-only.
I am very excited to have such a good handwritten formula recognition tool, which has helped me a lot.
I found several problems in using it.
Next I'll list some ambiguities and the latex code I expect to produce
To answer these:
write:△ABC
=> This usually occurs when the triangle has the same size than the letters. Currently, you should create a custom grammar definition in which you remove the delta symbol. The triangle will then no longer be confused with the delta, and will be properly recognized.
write:ac // df
=> In the same way, we recommend you create a custom gramar in which you remove all symbols that may be confused with the parallel and ensure you have the parallel symbol
write:3′ 45″
=> This is currently not properly supported. We would recommend that you do a "post-treatment" and when "exponent 1" or "exponent 11" is found, you replace it accordingly.
write:20℃
=> Degree is indeed difficult to recognize, as easily confused with expononent 0. There are basically 2 possibilites, either you remove the support of the exponent or when exponent 0 is found, you replace it by degree.
write:⏥abcd
=>this symbol is not supported, we will then not be able to return it.
I am very excited to have such a good handwritten formula recognition tool, which has helped me a lot.
I found several problems in using it.
Next I'll list some ambiguities and the latex code I expect to produce
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: