Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade from 1.4.0 to 1.5.0 disables user login #245

Open
robetus opened this issue Mar 7, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Upgrade from 1.4.0 to 1.5.0 disables user login #245

robetus opened this issue Mar 7, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@robetus
Copy link

robetus commented Mar 7, 2023

I upgraded just now using the default github script and mysql password, all updated with no errors and version 1.5.0 was outputted in guacd -v but then my login was completely disabled. I checked the database and the user was still there but I couldn't see the username and I could not login. I had a proxmox backup that I had to restore to get guacamole back to version 1.4.0.

Any thoughts on this?

@shanelynn321
Copy link

shanelynn321 commented Aug 11, 2023

I am struggling with this exact issue with 1.5.1, 1.5.2, and 1.5.3. I too had a backup first thankfully. I have restored over 20 times over the past 3 days. Checking the logs is showing an error with the compatibility for the SQL connector and the totp, but I presume this is because the gui is still reporting 1.4.0 even though guacd -v shows 1.5.1.

@RFrost619
Copy link

Same, but I had no backup... So, with nothing to lose, I followed the same installation steps from my original install, rebooted, and now it's back up and running. I've launched a few sessions and haven't noticed any issues.

https://guacamole.apache.org/doc/gug/installing-guacamole.html

@Goku103
Copy link

Goku103 commented Nov 7, 2023

Hi,
I have an almost similar problem.
Has anyone found the solution?

@jsbear
Copy link

jsbear commented Nov 8, 2023

Spin up an Ubuntu Server VM or physical box, install Docker, Portainer etc. Run the container version of Guacamole. This has worked out well for me. Not sure this script is actively maintained anymore, at least not to the level it once was.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants