Follow up on the output for testing FLHIST #230
Replies: 6 comments 5 replies
-
Reply to "@PeterHjortLauritzen : please do you need the 'WV_..' in this run." No |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
For turning on COSP, it is just: That should turn on COSP and add a bunch of default monthly output. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Diags for the previous run are here: Nothing crazy in the LW. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I am thinking about a light version of the aerosol output. The list above is not all needed for the general budget, so I reduced it to what is really needed. Sorry I did not sort it out earlier. In addition, we could also combine, say bc_a1 and bc_a4, but then we don't have the information on those parts that interact with clouds and those that don't, so I am not doing it here. We could, however combine other variables and still do the budget. This could be the aerosol light list, but it also requires some namelist additions to sum up the specific variables. Would this be a more reasonable list? 'AQSO4_H2O2','AQSO4_O3', 'bc_a1','bc_a4', 'dst_a2', 'dst_a3', 'ncl_a1', |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@tilmes Can you put together the necessary namelist definitions to create this lighter aerosol list? It's needed for #233 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@cecilehannay |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Here is what we are output for our runs. Please review carefully and let me know if you miss anything.
@adamrher: I will add CO2
@brianpm: adding COSP. Please let me know how to do it. Last time I tried, it didn't work.
@PeterHjortLauritzen : please do you need the 'WV_..' in this run.
@tilmes: do you need all the variables below.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions