Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New FMT run with coupled tag #360

Closed
PeterHjortLauritzen opened this issue Aug 10, 2023 · 8 comments
Closed

New FMT run with coupled tag #360

PeterHjortLauritzen opened this issue Aug 10, 2023 · 8 comments
Labels
Run request Label for CAM developpers who requested a new development simulation

Comments

@PeterHjortLauritzen
Copy link

Description of the run

To guide WACCM development I propose a new baseline with FMT using our latest coupled configuration. Details will be decided next week when @cecilehannay and @JulioTBacmeister are back. In particular, the QBO with the latest tag / configuration needs to be assessed. (the previous run used a different HB code #312)

Suffix in the casename

Suffix

Namelist modifications

Namelist

Source modifications

SourceMods

Sandbox

Requested sandbox or tag

Contact info

@PeterHjortLauritzen @cecilehannay @JulioTBacmeister @islasimpson

Any other relevant information

Enter relevant info

@PeterHjortLauritzen PeterHjortLauritzen added the Run request Label for CAM developpers who requested a new development simulation label Aug 10, 2023
@tilmes
Copy link

tilmes commented Aug 11, 2023

@PeterHjortLauritzen I am suggesting to also do a new FMT HIST run with the recent tuning to explore improvements in the tape recorder and GW, but use the new setting that are in the latest coupled run for the LT model. So, basically this run #347 with new tag and settings.
I would also want to do a full chemistry run again after that, to see how things change.

@cecilehannay
Copy link
Collaborator

@adamrher and @PeterHjortLauritzen: we decided to match "34" for that run (#361) as of yesterday it was our favorite run. Based on today's results, do we want to move to another run (maybe "37" ? i.e. #367 )

@cecilehannay
Copy link
Collaborator

Or "33" as we have a FLTHIST for that one and we are planning to do a F1850. So many options...

@cecilehannay
Copy link
Collaborator

Following up the CAM7 discussion today, we decided that we will base this run on #353. This is the FLHIST equivalent of the coupled run "33"

The run directory is at:
/glade/p/cesmdata/cseg/runs/cesm2_0/f.cam6_3_119.FMTHIST_ne30.r328_gamma0.33_soae.001

The difference between

  • the FLHIST (<)
  • and the FMTHIST (>) are:
<  ncdata               = 'f.cam6_3_107.FLTHIST_v0a.ne30.clm5_1.001.cam.i.1994-01-01-00000.nc'
---
>  ncdata               = '/glade/p/cesmdata/inputdata/atm/cam/inic/se/cam7_FMT_ne30pg3_mg17_L93_c221118.nc'
<  se_hypervis_subcycle         =  4 
---
>  se_hypervis_subcycle         =  3 

<  se_nsplit            =                    2 
---
>  se_nsplit            =   3  

<  se_nu_top            =  1.25e5 
---
>  se_nu_top            =  1.0e6 

<  se_rsplit            =  3 
---
>  se_rsplit            =  6 
<  effgw_beres_dp               = 0.30D0
---
>  effgw_beres_dp               = 0.70D0

<  gw_qbo_hdepth_scaling                = 1.0D0
---
>  gw_qbo_hdepth_scaling                = 0.25D0
>  gw_top_taper         = .false.
>  qbo_use_forcing              = .false.

<  ubc_file_input_type          = 'SERIAL'
<  ubc_file_path                = '/glade/p/cesmdata/inputdata/atm/cam/chem/ubc/f.e21.FWHISTBgcCrop.f09_f09_mg17.CMIP6-AMIP-WACCM.ensAvg123.cam.h0zm.UBC.195001-201412_c220322.nc'

<  ubc_specifier                = 'Q:H2O->UBC_FILE'

@cecilehannay
Copy link
Collaborator

I am also adding the variables requested by @tilmes in: #363 (comment)

@cecilehannay
Copy link
Collaborator

@JulioTBacmeister: incase this is useful, I am adding the list of gw parameters.

&gw_drag_nl
 effgw_beres_dp		= 0.70D0
 effgw_cm		= 1.D0
 effgw_rdg_beta		= 0.5D0
 effgw_rdg_beta_max		= 0.5D0
 fcrit2		= 1.0
 frontgfc		= 3.00D-15
 gw_apply_tndmax		= .false.
 gw_dc		= 2.5D0
 gw_dc_long		= 0.D0
 gw_drag_file		= '/glade/p/cesmdata/inputdata/atm/waccm/gw/newmfspectra40_dc25.nc'
 gw_limit_tau_without_eff		= .false.
 gw_lndscl_sgh		= .true. 
 gw_oro_south_fac		= 1.d0   
 gw_polar_taper		= .false.
 gw_prndl		= 0.5D0
 gw_qbo_hdepth_scaling		= 0.25D0
 gw_top_taper		= .false.
 n_rdg_beta		= 10
 pgwv		= 32
 pgwv_long		= 0
 rdg_beta_cd_llb		= 1.0D0
 tau_0_ubc		= .true.
 taubgnd		= 1.25D-3
 trpd_leewv_rdg_beta		= .false.
 use_gw_rdg_beta		= .true.
 use_gw_rdg_gamma		= .false.
/
&gw_rdg_nl
 gw_rdg_c_betamax_ds		=  0.0d0  
 gw_rdg_c_betamax_sm		=  2.0d0  
 gw_rdg_c_gammamax		=  2.0d0  
 gw_rdg_do_adjust_tauoro		= .true.  
 gw_rdg_do_backward_compat		= .false.
 gw_rdg_do_divstream		= .true.
 gw_rdg_do_smooth_regimes		= .false. 
 gw_rdg_fr_c		= 1.0D0
 gw_rdg_frx0		=  2.0d0  
 gw_rdg_frx1		=  3.0d0  
 gw_rdg_orohmin		=  0.01d0 
 gw_rdg_orom2min		=  0.1d0  
 gw_rdg_orostratmin		=  0.002d0
 gw_rdg_orovmin		=  1.0d-3 
/

@PeterHjortLauritzen
Copy link
Author

Dycore variables look correct!

@cecilehannay
Copy link
Collaborator

See: #374

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Run request Label for CAM developpers who requested a new development simulation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants