You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, openstudio-standards runs it's own version of the VRP calculations to adjust the minimum damper position upward for critical zones (in air_loop_hvac_adjust_minimum_vav_damper_positions()), which reduced the overall minimum OA for the VAV airloops. These adjusted minimum damper positions and the adjusted minimum system OA flow rate are then hard-sized in the model. This was done because EnergyPlus could not account for a target minimum ventilation efficiency in autosizing.
As of EnergyPlus 9.4.0 (OpenStudio 3.1.0), this autosizing capability has been added. Switching to use this capability would allow us to remove a large amount of complex code in air_loop_hvac_adjust_minimum_vav_damper_positions(). If we ever decide to remove backward compatibility with OS versions < 3.10, we could also switch to this approach and greatly reduce the complexity of the VAV damper position logic.
In order to use the EnergyPlus autosizing approach, the following fields must be set:
In the AirLoopHVACSizing:System object, sizing_system.setSystemOutdoorAirMethod('Standard62.1VentilationRateProcedure')
In the Sizing:Zone for each zone on the system, sizing_zone.setDesignMinimumZoneVentilationEfficiency(min_evz), where min_evz is the minimum ventilation efficiency used to increase minimum damper positions. This gives EnergyPlus a target to use when adjust the minimum damper position upward when autosizing. Current assumption is that for DOE-pre-1980 and 1980-2004, the dampers were NOT adjusted, implying min_evz = 0 and for all other templates, min_evz = 0.6
In the Sizing:Zone for each zone on the system, sizing_zone.setCoolingMinimumAirFlowFraction(min_damper_position), where min_damper_position is determined by air_terminal_single_duct_vav_reheat_minimum_damper_position(). This gives EnergyPlus a minimum flow fraction to use when autosizing the minimum damper position.
In the AirTerminal:SingleDuct:VAV:Reheat or AirTerminal:SingleDuct:VAV:NoReheat for each zone on the system, tell EnergyPlus to Autosize the minimu damper position using terminal.autosizeConstantMinimumAirFlowFraction(). This autosizing will use the info in Sizing:Zone object, starting with the minimum damper position as the lower bound and increasing to meet the minimum Evz as required.
Implementation of this approach would be greatly simplified by the removal of the model_create_prototype_model() code from openstudio-standards, as this method currently has a series of hard-coded assumptions for specially setting the damper positions in the VAV systems for operating rooms in the Hospital and Outpatient models.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
That approach (native feature in EnergyPlus) still has one major issue.
The EnergyPlus calculated minimum damper positions can result in a minimum system primary air flow rate that is lower than the required system outdoor air intake (Vot). When this happens no adjustment is made to the MDPs and the modeled OA ends being smaller than required. This impacts the overall energy use of the system. We currently do have something built in OpenStudio-Standards to deal with that situation (not perfect, but does enforce the minimum OA intake).
That's something to consider if we do decide to move forward.
Currently, openstudio-standards runs it's own version of the VRP calculations to adjust the minimum damper position upward for critical zones (in
air_loop_hvac_adjust_minimum_vav_damper_positions()
), which reduced the overall minimum OA for the VAV airloops. These adjusted minimum damper positions and the adjusted minimum system OA flow rate are then hard-sized in the model. This was done because EnergyPlus could not account for a target minimum ventilation efficiency in autosizing.As of EnergyPlus 9.4.0 (OpenStudio 3.1.0), this autosizing capability has been added. Switching to use this capability would allow us to remove a large amount of complex code in
air_loop_hvac_adjust_minimum_vav_damper_positions()
. If we ever decide to remove backward compatibility with OS versions < 3.10, we could also switch to this approach and greatly reduce the complexity of the VAV damper position logic.In order to use the EnergyPlus autosizing approach, the following fields must be set:
AirLoopHVAC
Sizing:System
object,sizing_system.setSystemOutdoorAirMethod('Standard62.1VentilationRateProcedure')
Sizing:Zone
for each zone on the system,sizing_zone.setDesignMinimumZoneVentilationEfficiency(min_evz)
, wheremin_evz
is the minimum ventilation efficiency used to increase minimum damper positions. This gives EnergyPlus a target to use when adjust the minimum damper position upward when autosizing. Current assumption is that for DOE-pre-1980 and 1980-2004, the dampers were NOT adjusted, implyingmin_evz = 0
and for all other templates,min_evz = 0.6
Sizing:Zone
for each zone on the system,sizing_zone.setCoolingMinimumAirFlowFraction(min_damper_position)
, wheremin_damper_position
is determined byair_terminal_single_duct_vav_reheat_minimum_damper_position()
. This gives EnergyPlus a minimum flow fraction to use when autosizing the minimum damper position.AirTerminal:SingleDuct:VAV:Reheat
orAirTerminal:SingleDuct:VAV:NoReheat
for each zone on the system, tell EnergyPlus to Autosize the minimu damper position usingterminal.autosizeConstantMinimumAirFlowFraction()
. This autosizing will use the info inSizing:Zone
object, starting with the minimum damper position as the lower bound and increasing to meet the minimum Evz as required.Implementation of this approach would be greatly simplified by the removal of the
model_create_prototype_model()
code from openstudio-standards, as this method currently has a series of hard-coded assumptions for specially setting the damper positions in the VAV systems for operating rooms in the Hospital and Outpatient models.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: