Replies: 4 comments 2 replies
-
What source current are you using? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The images obtained with GaussianSource, additionally I tried ContinuousSource and the results were practically the same. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The time dependence doesn't matter here since you are using a DFT monitor (though I would recommend a GaussianSource so that you only need a short simulation). The key question is what is the spatial profile and orientation of the current source? Can you just post the code for your current source? (I'm transferring this to a discussion since it seems unlikely to be a bug in Meep, rather than just a misunderstanding of how sources work.) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
So you have an electric current (J) sheet in a yz plane, with the current oriented in the z direction (Ez) and an amplitude ~exp(ikx) determined by your desired planewave angle. Unsurprisingly, this produces a planewave that is polarized more in the z direction than in the y direction; it's certainly not purely s or p polarized. You should read the review article https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.5366 to learn about the Equivalence Principle and how current sources relate to waves. If you want to excite an s- or p-polarized planewave with a given angle and amplitude, it is probably easier to use a |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hello everyone,
I am still trying to realize a 3D model with planewave at oblique incidence. For oblique incidence I use theta and phi (azimuth) angles and two dft monitors to get Ey and Ez fields. At phi = 45 degree I should get Ey and Ez field with the same amplitudes and the assumption is confirmed by lumerical results. But MEEP performed one component field (which is specified in source) with high amplitude and the other component field with low amplitude. Could you tell me please, how I can solve the problem? Thanks!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions