You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Found this recent implementation that might help getting started: https://bl.ocks.org/kerryrodden/7090426
Happy to give it a go later this week unless someone beats me to it.
TBH, I'm much less fond of the sunburst than I used to be.
The general challenge with flamegraphs is focusing their user's attention on the wide&flat parts and ignoring spiky flames. I feel like the sunburst draws attention to the spikes even more than the typical flamegraph layout.
Of course it could always be interesting to toggle to sunburst, but I wouldn't necessarily encourage it these days. :) I think flame and icicle views are the bees knees.
IMO if sunburst were attempted, I think it definitely needs the adjacent tree (like we see in Baobab).
spiermar
changed the title
Sunburst layout toggle
sunburst layout toggle
Jun 18, 2018
Similar to #8, this would be an option to draw the flamegraphs in the sunburst layout (radial coordinates).
First use of it I think came from here by @paulirish: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=452624
I've also written about the layout here: http://www.brendangregg.com/blog/2017-02-06/flamegraphs-vs-treemaps-vs-sunburst.html
We can have it as a mode. This is why I wanted flamegraphs to go d3 in the first place, so we can make it more interactive and manipulatable.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: