You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 21, 2024. It is now read-only.
A customizable order would be neat, just not a change it's easy to fit in or even prioritize especially when it conflicts with something else we like: the option #s being consistent. This may well be a flat "no", but could be an option we consider when next we toy with the UI, especially if it sticks around as a UI suggestion in its own issue.
very understandable that it would take time, but i would still love for this to be an option eventually if possible! not sure if this would make it more or less complicated, but in order to preserve the option #s a whole separate feature to make your own fully customised buttons and choose what actions to put on them and in what order would be ideal!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
#1838
very understandable that it would take time, but i would still love for this to be an option eventually if possible! not sure if this would make it more or less complicated, but in order to preserve the option #s a whole separate feature to make your own fully customised buttons and choose what actions to put on them and in what order would be ideal!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: