Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ambiguous field names in response of requrest_tools.py push #79

Open
NickVolynkin opened this issue Jul 11, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Ambiguous field names in response of requrest_tools.py push #79

NickVolynkin opened this issue Jul 11, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@NickVolynkin
Copy link
Contributor

NickVolynkin commented Jul 11, 2023

On the market there's a statement with key 93843771:

    {
        "_key": "93843771",
        "createdOn": 1689098910158,
        "description": "description",
        "input_description": "input_description",
        "isPrivate": false,
        "name": "nickvolynkin_example_circuit",
        "sender": "nickvolynkin",
        "type": "placeholder-zkllvm",
        "updatedOn": 1689098910158,
        "url": "url"
    }

Pushing a proof proposal for this statement:

/proof-market-toolchain# python3 scripts/request_tools.py push --cost 2 --file /opt/zkllvm-template/src/main-input.json --key 93843771

returns the following data:

{
    "_key": "93846511",
    "statement_key": "93843771",
    "cost": 2,
    "sender": "nickvolynkin",
    "status": "created"
}

It's unclear what the _key is. Must be the proposal's ID.

@NickVolynkin NickVolynkin changed the title Duplicate fields for statement ID in response of requrest_tools.py push Ambiguous field names in response of requrest_tools.py push Jul 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant