-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
insulator2: 2.12.2 -> 2.13.2 #323882
insulator2: 2.12.2 -> 2.13.2 #323882
Conversation
ea54cda
to
beac072
Compare
|
@getchoo what do you think about the current changes? (i know the commits are not nicely done yet.) |
9bcf28d
to
ea31168
Compare
# see: https://github.com/andrewinci/insulator2/pull/733 | ||
(fetchpatch { | ||
name = "fix-rust-1.80.0"; | ||
url = "https://github.com/andrewinci/insulator2/commit/7dbff0777c4364eec68cf90488d99f06b11dfa98.patch"; | ||
hash = "sha256-P8rBufYpREP5tOO9vSymvms4f2JbsUEjK7/yn9P7gYk="; | ||
}) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd prefer we wait for this to have an actual in-tree commit, or just vendor it here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i submitted one week ago: andrewinci/insulator2#733
i guess this will take much time...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd recommend vendoring the patch here then. It's just more reliable than a commit from a fork
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is already the official repo... the fork would be https://github.com/Stunkymonkey/insulator2
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Commit from a GitHub PR isn't guaranteed to be stable. Upstream author may require you to do a force push which may break the visibility of this commit hash. Thus it would be better to add a patch in this repo instead.
And since you already have Cargo.lock here, you can patch Cargo.toml only, and copy Cargo.lock
ea31168
to
35c788f
Compare
ping at reviewers |
35c788f
to
817fd89
Compare
Description of changes
part of #240174
Things done
nix.conf
? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxed
sandbox = true
nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"
. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/
)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.