Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change MOSART runoff model in compset? #105

Closed
evalieungh opened this issue May 19, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Change MOSART runoff model in compset? #105

evalieungh opened this issue May 19, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@evalieungh
Copy link
Collaborator

@mvdebolskiy mentioned we might want to change the compset for default cases away from MOSART and rather use stub (?) runoff if we want to make it easier to add new sites.

If I remember correctly, @huitang-earth chose the compset with MOSART long ago and no-one has changed it afterwards. Is there a reason to keep MOSART as default?

A solution might be to change the default to the stub runoff, but add an option for changing to MOSART when we add possibility for users to modify case compsets. @ka7eh, what do you think about compset customisation?

@ka7eh
Copy link
Member

ka7eh commented May 19, 2022

Making compsets customizable should be straightforward. I think the main change would be in configs, where we define what predefined compsets or combinations are supported for each site and let users pick one.

I created an issue for it here: NorESMhub/ctsm-api#5.

@huitang-earth
Copy link
Collaborator

@evalieungh Yes, We should turn off MOSART for new model versions. This was suggested by Dev when we discussed together in Helsinki. It is kept on my "to-do" list.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants