Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ocrd network documentation circle linking #1042

Open
joschrew opened this issue Apr 5, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

ocrd network documentation circle linking #1042

joschrew opened this issue Apr 5, 2023 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@joschrew
Copy link
Contributor

joschrew commented Apr 5, 2023

In the ocrd_network-package-readme it says go to ocr-d-core for further information and vice versa.
Do we already have information about that? Otherwise we need to at least provide something in the ocrd_network readme.

@joschrew joschrew self-assigned this Apr 5, 2023
@MehmedGIT
Copy link
Contributor

The README file was added prematurely to ocrd_network. It serves no purpose currently. Honestly, I don't see any value in updating that now when many things are still constantly changing. Keeping the README file up-to-date will require extra effort that can go to more important tasks. However, at some point, we need to provide that when the ocrd_network is mature enough.

@joschrew
Copy link
Contributor Author

joschrew commented Apr 5, 2023

I wondered if we already have written down something regarding the ocrd_network or processing server, what we could simply link there. I know we have the config-spec Triet wrote, but I am rather looking for something with sentences and words not technical yaml files. At least I would then remove the circle linking and just write something like "TODO: add useful info here" instead of linking back and forth.

@MehmedGIT
Copy link
Contributor

Not sure what is good.

I know we have the config-spec Triet wrote, but I am rather looking for something with sentences and words not technical yaml files.

Should I mention that the config spec is no longer up-to-date after adding the Processor Server option in #1030? I am not even sure the extension of the config is good enough in its current form. No matter what we write now, will be outdated fast.

@kba
Copy link
Member

kba commented Apr 6, 2023

Documentation is important and the README will become relevant once we start publishing to PyPI but for now, I would really focus on the implementation and just leave a big warning at the beginning of the README.md that development is ongoing and changes can be swift. Then let's update once things have settled down.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants