-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Edits by "mandyboy" #32
Comments
Helpful references
@TagaSanPedroAko you may use OSMCha to tag the harmful changests, should you decide to review their edits. By the way, have you tried getting in touch with them, or leaving comments on affected changsets? |
I reverted the deletion of St. Jerome Emiliani Institute this time (See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53682304), but if you can catch up, you may revert the others. Fortunately, he tagged his own edits for review, so we can take action for each. |
Just spotted this user removing De La Salle Zobel Vermosa and a nearby subdivision. I have just reverted those (See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53682612, http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53682450). Please keep this issue open and revert the remaining edits involving mass deletions. |
Have you been in touch with them? Have you left comments on their changesets? After doing so, kindly consider filing a report to DWG, and request for a temporary ban to get their attention about their counter-productive edits. |
I have added comments to changesets where I spotted several important POI's being deleted. I prefer just a revert of all of that user's mass deletions, but a block (at least a week or two) may be requested while we will restore those deleted features. The user is apparently new, and he must be told about his mass deletions and the use of a vague comment to hide those data removals. |
Just warned again that user, that he may be reported to the DWG. I just spotted that user deleting residential area polygons for no reason. Even Versailles along Daang Hari has been targets by those needless mass deletions. Those are enough to warrant a block from the DWG, as we can consider those as disruptive. We may start reverting several changesets that deleted many important map data, even before we can report that user. |
I have just mailed the DWG regarding "mandyboy"'s mass deletions. We may start reverting at least part of his changesets which involved mass deletions, while the case is being decided upon. |
Have no longer seen activity by that user, but we may start cleanup of that user's edits. |
Asked @ianlopez1115 about a possible revert of its edits, but I still wait for a response, so I ping him here. |
@TagaSanPedroAko, I have no objections to the revert action. Please proceed with caution with subsequent edits that corrected or fixed Mandyboy's changes. |
I have already done some reverts, but only for a few POIs, since I have edits limited to iD. So, I'm okay if you handle the rest using JOSM. |
I've updated the original post to include the user's changesets. |
Made several reverts last Thursday, but cannot revert some because of pre-condition violations. |
@TagaSanPedroAko |
This concern has been reported to DWG, and they've agreed to help with the reverts. FYI. |
This seems to be a new user, but there are problems regarding his edits. This user has deleted many significant features around the Molino area in Bacoor, and the Ecological Park (and St. Jerome Emiliani Institute?) are now gone. Please keep an eye for his edits, and revert any changeset that are deemed harmful because it is a mass deletion without a detailed explanation or rationale. The edits by this user are marked for review, so we can catch up with those if we can.
mandyboy's changesets
Kindly review the following changesets, and roll-back if appropriate. Tick the checkbox for each changeset when you've completed the review process, and if necessary any roll-back action.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: