-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test export_workspace + asset_per_band combination #905
Comments
example job that should be able to work: j-241011225b584a8ca14e374da7a9afe4 |
In cdse integrationtests, @EmileSonneveld is working on asset_per_band. |
@JeroenVerstraelen which existing integration test? I can't find any export_workspace or asset_per_band related test in neither:
|
For this issue we will probably have to create a bucket for integration tests to avoid using (and leaking) workspace names of project specific buckets |
This integration test would be in a private repo, so not risk of leaking workspace names |
…ded with filepath_per_asset later. #905
can't we have the test logic public, but we manage the secrets in the Vault? We already have plenty of tests that work that way |
Requires a bucket for integration tests and a workspace. |
FYI: https://docs.getmoto.org/en/latest/docs/server_mode.html For example I used that in the tests for a pytest plugin for the APEx benchmarks |
Edit batch job options from existing integrationtest
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: