Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve support for the Federation Extension #32

Open
3 tasks
m-mohr opened this issue Aug 28, 2024 · 2 comments
Open
3 tasks

Improve support for the Federation Extension #32

m-mohr opened this issue Aug 28, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@m-mohr
Copy link
Member

m-mohr commented Aug 28, 2024

In the EOEPCA+ project, we made an evaluation of the federation-related functionality available through the openEO Julia client.
The Federation Extension can be found here: https://github.com/Open-EO/openeo-api/blob/draft/extensions/federation/README.md

The following issues have been identified:

  • The federation property in GET / is not available, which is due to Retrieval of capabilities #31
  • federation:missing can't be accessed through the corresponding functions for the following endpoints:
    • GET /collections
    • GET /processes
    • GET /jobs

Additional functionality might be missing in the future for other endpoints which have not been implemented yet (e.g. GET /file_formats as reported in #30)

In addition the following general issue has been identified: #29

@m-mohr m-mohr added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 28, 2024
@danlooo
Copy link
Collaborator

danlooo commented Aug 29, 2024

Thanks for the suggestion! When can we expect to have a stable API for the Federation Extension?

@m-mohr
Copy link
Member Author

m-mohr commented Oct 12, 2024

It's a work in progress, but more towards additions. What is already in the document should be pretty stable. I don't expect significant changes there.

Also, for context: I did this evaluation for another project to see how far each client is with regards to federations. We don't expect any work on the client right now to support it. This was more a status report :-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants